Posts
Movie Review:
NEW BLONDE BOND,
SAME GOOD OLD ACTION
Americans for years have had a fascination for the British secret agent who, before his successful films, was just another character in a series of novels by Former British WWII Agent Ian Fleming. Sean Connery (The Untouchables) of course became the first to have the chance to showcase stylish action skills and impeccable cunning as Ian Fleming’s famous 007. Connery was followed by Roger Moore (007 For Your Eyes Only) and others; the latest two being the charming Pierce Brosnan (007 Goldeneye), and the blonde pretty boy Daniel Craig. When Craig was introduced as the new Bond in 007 Casino Royale, Americans all asked the same questions: “Who the heck is this guy?” and “Why is he blonde?” Well, those who are actively into movies would know Craig’s noteworthy role in Spielberg’s Munich. As for the blonde part, American filmmakers have always had a preference of blondes over brunettes. Am I right? Out of the other potential nominees, which included British powerhouses such as Hugh Grant, Clive Owen, and Orlando Bloom, Craig was the only one who not only looked the part, but acted better than any Bond that America had seen since Sir Sean Connery.
Fleming’s 007 Casino Royale starts at the beginning of Bonds career when he has yet to achieve his double-0 status. Packed with lengthy chase scenes, action packed encounters with epic villains such as Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen), and beautiful damsels in distress, make Bonds newest flick the best yet. Judy Dench’s (Shakespeare in Love) performance as “M” deserved an Oscar nomination of its own, and Craig’s performance as the 007 (which was nominated for a BAFTA Award) was so believable, that he could make Bond more popular than he already is (if that’s even possible). So it just goes to show; no matter what color your hair is, its your acting that makes your character worth watching.
7.5 out of 10
By Soham
